ANALISIS PENERIMAAN ZOOM MEETING SEBAGAI MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN UTAUT2 DAN VARIABEL AUTONOMY

Yoga Listi Prambodo; Sharyanto Sharyanto; Joko Saputro

doi:10.52362/jisicom.v9i2.2148

Yoga Listi Prambodo Universitas Bung Karno, Jakarta
Sharyanto Sharyanto Universitas Bung Karno, Jakarta
Joko Saputro Universitas Bung Karno, Jakarta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52362/jisicom.v9i2.2148

Abstract

This study analyzes the acceptance of the Zoom Meeting teleconference media by integrating the Autonomy variable into the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) model. The research was conducted at STT Wastukancana Purwakarta with 330 respondents consisting of active students and lecturers. Using a quantitative approach with purposive sampling, data were collected through online questionnaires and processed using SmartPLS. The results show that all UTAUT2 constructs—Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, Facilitating Conditions, Hedonic Motivation, Price Value, and Habit—significantly influence Behavioral Intention to use Zoom Meeting as a learning medium. Moreover, Autonomy has a positive and significant effect on Effort Expectancy, Performance Expectancy, and Behavioral Intention, indicating that the higher the autonomy of users in the learning process, the greater their acceptance of teleconference technology. This study confirms that the integration of Autonomy into the UTAUT2 model strengthens the theoretical understanding of user acceptance behavior in online learning environments during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” J. Mark. Res., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 1981.
[2] D. Putra and A. Hidayat, “Pengaruh konstruk UTAUT2 terhadap penerimaan e-learning di perguruan tinggi,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2022.
[3] F. Dwivedi et al, “Examining citizen adoption of e-government services: A UTAUT2 perspective,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 310–325, 2019.
[4] H. Zhou, Y. Jin, and C. Fang, “Exploring the factors influencing mobile shopping adoption,” elematics and Informatics, vol. 38, pp. 126–138, 2019.
[5] J. C. Roca and M. Gagné, “Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1585–1604, 2008.
[6] J. P. S. Lakhal, F. Khechine, “Exploring the influence of autonomy on students’ behavioral intentions to use webinar in distance education,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2134–2143, 2013.
[7] J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Sage Publications, 2018.
[8] K. Steckelberg, Zoom usage statistics during pandemic. Kompas Tekno, 2020.
[9] L. Ryan and E. Deci, “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being,” Am. Psychol., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2000.
[10] M. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, 2021.
[11] M. Al-Emran and S. Shaalan, “E-learning acceptance: A review of the literature based on the UTAUT model,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 14, no. 20, pp. 1–21, 2017.
[12] Ø. Sorebo, H. Halvari, R. Gulli, and R. Kristiansen, “The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue using e-learning technology,” Comput. Educ., vol. 53, no. 1177–1187, 2009.
[13] R. Setiawan and D. Nugroho, “Analisis penerimaan sistem pembelajaran daring menggunakan model UTAUT2,” urnal Sist. Inf. Indones., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 112–121, 2021.
[14] U. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach, 8th ed. Wiley, 2020.
[15] V. Venkatesh, J. Y. L. Thong, “Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology,” MIS Q., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 157–178, 2012.
[16] W. Chin, “The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling,” in Modern Methods for Business Research, G. A. Marc. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998.