IMPROVING USER EXPERIENCE THROUGH GREENPEACE WEBSITE UI/UX REDESIGN WITH THINKING DESIGN METHOD
Abstract
Greenpeace, an organization dedicated to addressing environmental concerns, particularly the Climate Crisis, urges both the government and corporations to take responsibility for extensive land clearing for business purposes without implementing preventive measures. This lack of action poses potential negative consequences for Indonesia, especially in the economic sector. Despite ongoing issues arising from the Climate Crisis, there is still a dearth of government initiatives and community support. To address this, Greenpeace employs its website as an informational platform, providing details about areas impacted and the actions it takes to improve the Earth. In an effort to enhance the user experience in navigating Greenpeace's activities, the author and their team undertook a redesign of the website using Design Thinking as a method. Design Thinking, a problem-solving process centered on user interests and innovation, involves stages such as empathizing, defining, ideating, prototyping, and testing. The author mapped out problems during the empathize stage based on user experiences, defined core user issues in the define stage, expressed solutions in the ideate stage, implemented web design in the prototype stage, and, in the testing stage, assessed the success of the design in resolving problems and meeting user needs. The research outcomes are presented in the form of a prototype with a UI/UX design, developed by aligning with user needs through the Design Thinking method to provide a solution for user challenges when interacting with the Greenpeace website.
Downloads
References
[2] Vossen, G., Schönthaler, F., & Dillon, S. (2017). The Web at Graduation and Beyond. Springer Cham
[3] Rouse, Margaret. (2015). Mobile UI (Mobile User Interface). TechTarget.
[4] Marsh, Joel. (2015). UX for Beginners. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media, Inc. Nielsen, Jakob, dan Don Norman. (2015). The Definition of User Experience.
[5] Nielsen, J., & Mack, R. (1994). Heuristic Evaluation. In Usability Inspection Methods.
[6] Bevan, Nigel. 2006. International Standards for HCI and Usability. London UK
[7] Ridho Nastainullah. 2020. Panduan Figma Desain Website
[8] Ii, B. A. B. (1971). Don’t Make A Wave Committee ,. September, 36–55.
[9] Al-Faruq, M. N. M., Nur’aini, S., & Aufan, M. H. (2022). Perancangan UI/UX Semarang Virtual Tourism Dengan Figma. Walisongo Journal of Information Technology, 4(1), 43–52.
[10] Fariyanto, F., & Ulum, F. (2021). Perancangan Aplikasi Pemilihan Kepala Desa Dengan Metode Ux Design Thinking (Studi Kasus: Kampung Kuripan). Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi (JTSI), 2(2), 52–60. http://jim.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/JTSI.
[11] Fitri, D. M. A., Sulistiya, M., Azizah, N., Setyorini, R. I., & Herlina, H. (2021). Perancangan Aplikasi Money Box Dengan Menggunakan Figma. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Dan Robotika, 3(1), 11–22.
[12] Julianto, A. (2020). Perancangan Ulang Desain Antarmuka Aplikasi Berbasis Web Dengan Menggunakan Metode User Centered Design (Studi Kasus : Petshopgrosir). Elibrary UNIKOM, 1.
[13] Kurniawan, B., & Romzi, M. (2022). Perancangan UI/UX Aplikasi Manajemen Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Menggunakan Aplikasi Figma. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Mahakarya, 05(1), 1–7.
[14] Nadhif, A. K., Jati, D. T. W., Hussein, M. F., & Widiati, I. S. (2021). Perancangan UI/UX Aplikasi Penjualan Dengan Pendekatan Design Thinking. Jurnal Ilmiah IT CIDA, 7(1), 44–55.
[15] Shirvanadi, E. C., & Idris, M. (2021). Perancangan ulang UI/UX situs e-learning aminkom center metode design thinking (studi kasus: amikom center). Automata, 2, 1–8 Sommerville.Ian (2011) “Software Engineering” 9th Edition, Published by Addison-Wesley.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.